Home » Information » The Bishop Blanks the Blair

The Bishop Blanks the Blair

Attention: open in a new window. PDFPrintE-mail

joelhomeBishop Tutu has set the cat amongst the pigeons and resurrected the catastrophe of the Iraq war by refusing to appear on a platform with Mr Blair, and insisting that both he and President Bush be tried at the Hague for war crimes.

 

Even if Alistair Campbell, Blair's former communications guru is right in pointing out that Tutu had already agreed to appear with him and had gone as far as agreeing and accepting his speaker's fee, that has little bearing on the matter. Tutu is perfectly entitled to think twice. But equally, if Blair is to stand in the dock, we would also have to take the entire House of Commons with him. The decision to go to war which Blair instigated on the basis of misleading information was discussed and decided by a democratic process.

 

But true to form, Tutu has a lot of us scratching our heads. As an advisory member of the Tony Blair Faith Foundation, these issues are rather close to home for me.

Both men have an outstanding record in responding to issues of poverty and injustice. Blair was arguably the most committed British Prime Minister responding to poverty in Africa as well as some of the most intractable issues of the Middle East. Tutu is a synonym for political justice. To have both of these men in moral combat is disorientating. But this is not a case of the bishop versus the politician. It is actually an ethical conflict between two global Christian leaders; between a high profile Anglican and a global Catholic. Inevitably God will get dragged into the argument.

Ironically it helps me that both Tutu and Blair are men of faith. Putting aside the important controversy of Blair's decision and the outrageous results of the war for a moment, the idea of two people of faith disagreeing on such a momentous issue is not unusual. The lesson of history is that faith in the same God is no protection from strong disagreement.

We will all be poorer not to have had their combined contributions on the same platform, but we would be poorer still if people like Tutu with passionate convictions kept them to themselves.


Newer news items:

Comments  

 
0 # Stephen Pennells 2012-09-03 23:38
Well, having once shaken hands with Tutu and having a mutual friend I know that he is a m a n of faith and as such is not without the problems of Sin that beset us all. But I still find Blair's apparent refusal to accept some degree of real responsibility for the deaths of tens of thousands of Iraqis sticks in the craw. And as for the issues of addressing poverty; yes, perhaps he did do more than anyone previously, but is there ever a serious consideration of the ultimate questions of our responsibility- our rapacious lives snatch life chances from people in the South. I don't feel that it is acceptable to help them to be more like us without fundamentally challenging and changing the system that has got them into the straits they are in now. I believe we need a metamorphosis of not conformation to the schemata of this world (Rom.12:2). I don't see that with Blair and so cannot him with fundamentally "getting it".
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
Back to top

ShareThis